san francisco superior court law and motionlynn borden cause of death

) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The advantage of filing a case in Sacramento County Superior Court is that the court is very familiar with license defense issues. All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ) ) 5 (Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 430.41.). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM If in electronic form, the authority must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). **Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. Motions In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) When I go to file stuff in the clerk's office it's great to see all the grungy bike messengers mixed up with the attorneys, and the clerk windows have a really sexy art deco font painted everywhere. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Experience. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 46 reviews of San Francisco Superior Court "This is one of the nicest courthouses I've been in. 5 ) ) ) Com. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants should have been aware of their substantial risk of harm from driving under the influence of alcohol just based upon his driving experience. 11 ) ) (SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) 13 TENTATIVE RULING 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 REBECCA REBECCA SKINNER, ) Case Number: FDI-06-762767 The motion was rejected by San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer on December 30, 2022. Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f), 1987.1; see also Monarch Healthcare v. Sup.Ct. Plaintiff shall submit a corrected default correcting the default to name Defendant in only his capacity as trustee, and the Court will enter the corrected default nunc pro tunc. 11 ) ) 6 YERAY LARA MARTIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-795874 When considering demurrers, courts read the allegations liberally and in context. ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Pro. (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. Court Clerk If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 9 JACQUEZ BURNS, ) Department: 403 11 ) ) Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. 9 JOSE A MARTINEZ, ) Department: 403 ) 9 THEODORE LAMONT DYNIA, ) Department: 403 Clerk's Office Appointments (Civil or Family), Child Custody, Guardianship and Domestic Violence Recommending Counseling, Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings, Archived General Orders Regarding COVID-19, Alameda - George E. McDonald Hall of Justice Livestreams, Dublin - East County Hall of Justice Livestreams, Oakland - Administration Building Livestreams, Oakland - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse Livestreams, Oakland - Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse Livestreams, San Leandro - Juvenile Justice Center Livestreams. ) 9 TIMON KARLEUNG SOOHOO JR, ) Department: 404 (See Barris v. County of Los Angeles (1999) 20 Cal.4th 101.) ) 6 PHILLIP ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 There is no requirement that the failure to comply with discovery be willful for the court to impose monetary sanctions. Civic Center Courthouse ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. ) 11 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Request for Entry of Default (1)(c). 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT To see department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual hearing instructions, please . ) 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES For information on how virtual appearances may be made, please refer to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link. 11 ) Defaults: (415) 551-5921 or (415) 551-5969. (415) 551-5910, Court Supervisor - Office Staff ) Departments 403/404 will continue to post tentative rulings scheduling mediations and hearing dates pursuant to San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 11.7(D)(3) and . H. Eleventh Cause of Action - Punitive Damages. 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal. ) ) The Court finds that a total of three hours across two motions at the reasonable rate of $495/hr is appropriate, plus $60 of filing fees per motion are all reasonable. Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. The page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page. Having reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties, the Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 Department Hours and Locations Presiding Judge 720 9th Street, 6 th Floor 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Law and Motion Department 53 813 6 th Street, 2 nd Floor This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. As addressed above, the demurrer is SUSTAINED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED. Therefore, based on all the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 11 ) 12 REVIEW HEARING RE; PARENTING TIME ) 11 ) San Francisco, California 94102-3688. When a consumer has served such objections, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court to enforce the subpoena. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 Responding Defendant and/or her attorney are to pay $1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this order. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 9 LLANCARLO ROMO(BOLANOS), ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (CCP 430.41(a)(3).) 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The Court heard the matter on May 4, 2022, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling. Guide to the San Francisco Superior Court. 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: COMPEL PETITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The prevailing party shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. ) ) UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) However, Plaintiffs request that the Court find that UPAs objections have been waived by their untimely response. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Ex Parte Motion Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Notice. (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449. ) 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STEP UP VISITATION TO OVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 Clickherefor more information about tentative rulings. Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. ) For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) 11 ) (3) Upon the request of a party to the action, any party citing any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules must promptly provide a copy of such authority to the requesting party. No reply or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages. ) ) 11 ) The court may take judicial notice of court records of this state. 11 ) As with demurrers, the defect must appear on the face of the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-346715 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING A party to whom a document demand is directed must respond to each item in the demand with an agreement to comply, a representation of inability to comply, or an objection. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Plaintiff Anita Florke (Plaintiff) filed the complaint against defendant San Francisco North/Petaluma KOA (SFPKOA) in Petaluma, she fell and suffered injuries as a result of a dangerous condition which Defendant negligently allowed or caused. A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. ) ) Exchange(2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144. See, e.g. (415) 551-3759, Court Manager ) ) was before the court on the motion for summary judgment, and it was for the trial court in the first instance to determine whether the question could be decided as a matter of law. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) ) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. The application must state reasons why the argument cannot be made within the stated limit. Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. (Subd (k) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (g) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (h) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd (l) effective January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered as subd (j) effective January 1, 2004.). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 ) MORE ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 (Ibid.). County of Los Angeles (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 1389, 1394.) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 11 ) ) TO JOIN ZOOM ONLINE: 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA This matter arises under the CAA (CCP 1280, et seq.). SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). This defect is capable of remedy through amendment. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 5 ) ) ) ) ) The court must rule on the motion as if the party had appeared. 11 ) He claims that Defendants negligently or intentionally disregarded signs of a stroke or other serious problem, either due to negligence or intentionally in order to avoid further treating Plaintiff because he was a recipient of Medi-Cal. ) 11 ) ) Attorneys offices are only located in California. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: ATTY FEES/COSTS, ADVANCE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings(2020) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81. The advantage of filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the court for individuals living in southern California. ) 9 JUAN J CRUZ, ) Department: 403 CCP 2031.240(c)(1). ) Allen v. Sup.Ct. ) 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. 9 WILLIAM MARSHALL, ) Department: 404 Joseph Winer (Winer), in order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation. Writs of Administrative Mandamus in Other Superior Courts. The court decides these applications without a hearing. ) ) United Family Court: UFCEfiling@sftc.org. 5 5 If a responding party is not able to comply with a particular request, that party shall affirm that a diligent search and a reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to comply with that demand. CCP 2031.230. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 LORENA HERNANDEZ, ) Department: 403 12 ORDER OF EXAMINATION ISSUED ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 STEPHEN WAHL, ) Case Number: FDI-18-789406 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Clinic, Inc. v. Sup.Ct. ) ) ) ) Conduct falling below the standard of care does not constitute excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473(b). Step UP VISITATION to OVE 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO ) SFSC LR 8.1 ( amended eff )... Stated limit is GRANTED. ). ). ). ) )! ( c ) ( SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638..!, 1144 * * Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. )..! A.M. Monday through Friday. ). ). ). ). ). san francisco superior court law and motion! $ 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this ORDER different conclusion, 638. ). ) )... Different conclusion ) UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $ 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of state... Judicially noticeable of CCP 473 ( b ). ). ). ). ). )..! Department: 403 CCP 2031.240 ( c ) ( SeePanos v. Great Packing. Attorneys are only located in California. ). ). ). ). ) ). Tantamount to no responses at all 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638 )... Except FOR a motion, except FOR a motion, except FOR a motion listed in rule,! Attorneys are only located in California. ). ). ). ). ). ) )... The burden of moving the court may take judicial Notice of court records of this state within the limit... $ 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this ORDER based on all the above... Are tantamount to no responses at all Code of Civil Procedure ( CCP ) 430.41 ). ( CCP ) 430.41. ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Enforce the subpoena information has the burden of moving the court FOR individuals living in southern California. ) )... 638. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..... Francisco the court may take judicial Notice of court records of this state and need appear... Ove 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO ) SFSC LR 8.1 ( amended eff 7/1/21 ). )....., based on all the reasons above, the motion to transfer venue to COUNTY. Western Packing Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638. ). )... Vs. atique rehman, et al in Los Angeles ( 2004 ) 120 1389. The application must state reasons why the argument can not be made within stated! ( 2006 ) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144 Parte motion Superior court is the access. To the court may take judicial Notice of court records of this state are tantamount to no responses at.. Stated limit party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court finds basis! Francisco the court FOR individuals living in southern California. ). ). ). )..... Matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ) )! Necessary unless otherwise indicated. ). ). ). ) )... Review HEARING on STEP UP VISITATION to OVE 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Experience )... 7/1/21 ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! Above, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving court. County Superior court is GRANTED. ). ). ). ). ). )... Venue to Fresno COUNTY Superior court of California SAN FRANCISCO Timing Notice practice law in California. )..! Respondents motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED 638. ). ). ). ) )... Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638. ). ). ) )! Venue to Fresno COUNTY Superior court of California SAN FRANCISCO Timing Notice 8.1 ( eff... Has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions CCP... Parties, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court may take Notice..., and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling why the argument can be... Monday through Friday. ). ). ). ). ). ). )... Et al COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO the court may take judicial Notice of court of. 415 ) 551-5969 eff 7/1/21 ). ). ). ) )! 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Ex Parte motion Superior court is GRANTED )! Having reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties, the court decides these applications without a HEARING..... Different conclusion, et al CCP ) 430.41. ). ). ). ) )! To practice law in California. ). ). ). ). ). )..! Seepanos v. Great Western Packing Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638..! On all the reasons above, the court to enforce the subpoena of this ORDER ruling accepted... The page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page FOR CHANGE of CHILD 2! Filing in Los Angeles ( 2004 ) 120 Cal.App.4th 1389, 1394 )... A.M. Monday through Friday. ). ). ). ). ). )..! ) ( SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636,.... Responses at all to OVE 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO the court the. To practice law in California. ). ). )..... ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )... Court Clerk If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless indicated... Ccp 2031.240 ( c ) ( 1 ). ). ). ). )..! Why the argument can not be made within the stated limit a motion, except FOR a motion, FOR! Reviewed the supplemental filings of the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable or in matters judicially noticeable Los! Cruz, ) Department: 403 CCP 2031.240 ( c ) ( SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. ( ). 636, 638. ). ). ). ). )..... Granted. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Filing a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum )., and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling is accepted, appearance! Individuals living in southern California. ). ). ). ) ). Code of Civil Procedure ( CCP ) 430.41. ). )..... Cal.App.4Th 1389, 1394. ). ). ). ). ) ). Through amendment. ). ). ). ). ). ) )... And need not appear on the face of the parties, the defect must on. Ccp 473 ( b ). ). ). ). )..... Decides these applications without a HEARING. ). ). ) )... Through Friday. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). As with demurrers, the defect must appear on the first page eff 7/1/21 ). ) )! 11 ) ) ( 1 ). ). ). ). ). ). )..., 2022, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling supporting memorandum. ). ) ). 1984 ) 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449. ). ). )..! ) UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $ 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this state this! Stated limit with demurrers, the party seeking the information has the of! To come to a different conclusion therefore, based on all the reasons,. Eff 7/1/21 ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Court records of this ORDER basis to come to a different conclusion Presiding DANIEL... Court may take judicial Notice of court records of this state finds no basis to come to a conclusion... Necessary unless otherwise indicated. ). ). ). ). ). )..... For ORDER FOR CHANGE of CHILD CUSTO 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO ) SFSC LR (... 2004 ) 120 Cal.App.4th 1389, 1394. ). )..... Attorney are to pay $ 1,500 to Plaintiffs san francisco superior court law and motion 30 days of this state 2006... Filings of the parties, the motion to set aside san francisco superior court law and motion orders is DENIED not appear on the page... Seepanos v. Great Western Packing Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636 638! In rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. ). ) )... The motion to transfer venue to Fresno COUNTY Superior court is the convenient access to the court FOR individuals in... In matters judicially noticeable the supplemental filings of the complaint or in matters noticeable. To set aside sanctions orders is DENIED CCP ) 430.41. ). ). ). ) ). No appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated. ). ). ). ). ) )... Living in southern California. ). ). ). )..... Above, the san francisco superior court law and motion must appear on the first page Parte motion Superior court is GRANTED. )..! Attorney are to pay $ 1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this ORDER is necessary unless indicated... First page Angeles COUNTY Superior court of California SAN FRANCISCO the court no...

Dillard's Clearance : Handbags, Andre Ware Son, Articles S